Thursday, November 27, 2008
Advent Listenables
Thanksgiving Readables
If you’ll pardon the pun, the New York Times has two articles providing food for thought around Thanksgiving. Both are fascinating historical perspectives for us amateur history buffs. The first is more nostalgic, the second is thankful that parts of our past remain there.
This Thanksgiving, reflect on the wild, drink some French wine, pray for peace and, of course, be thankful for all God has given us.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Economy, change of laws and culture are hitting the French cafes
Friday, November 21, 2008
Maybe un till should have a logo
There’s a beautiful simplicity to a good logo. Or, for that matter, call it a brand or a seal. I like the thought of looking at a symbol and immediately seeing a story. They are open for interpretation, but powerful nonetheless. Our forbearers would see the seal from the king’s signet ring, or the hide-burns of a particular cowboy, and images, weight and emotion would meet you. These days, mighty corporations have mastered the power of the seal. You know you made it as a company when your company name does not even need to appear on the logo. Think of the Nike Swoosh on Cristiano Ronaldo’s cleats, or the glowing apple cutout on the other side of my screen.
Perhaps my favorite prominent display of brands is sports logos. They represent not just a franchise but also a city, a university or an attitude. The best part is that it’s usually a combination of letters and colors that get people riled up. A white “n” and “y” overlapping a navy blue field makes a statement. In our civilized age where we celebrate our diversity and accept everyone else as fellow citizens, sports remain an outlet for our tribal tendencies. We wear our colors and paint our faces as cheer on our strongest champions as they wage battle against the tribe from another city.
Of course, the most prominent logo in the past months has been the Barack Obama “O.” The first time I saw it, I knew it was genius. It’s a modern day signet ring for the man who will be “the leader of the free world.” It inspires Obama’s emotions of change and hope without compromising patriotism and strength. Regardless of your politics, you’ve got to admire the marketing. The New York Times has a great interview with the man who created the “O.” I find particularly interesting his reflection on how they tried to avoid the candidate being “branded, in the sense of having an identity imposed on a candidate.”
Finally, I have to give a shout out to logos that start a conversation. My church has adopted what has been lovingly dubbed “the flaming pomegranate,” which Ben designed. I was living with him when he first drafted the pomegranate, and I saw it take several forms before there was a finished product. It is a less obvious brand then, say, a cross, or a more common church symbol such as a lion lying down with a lamb. However, I think this is a good thing. When people ask what it means, I get to explain how the pomegranate was an ancient church symbol for the Resurrection. Moreover, since a pomegranate has seemingly countless seeds packed in one fruit, it is also a symbol of church unity. Perhaps it is does not have the mass market potential as the “O” or the Swoosh, but in starting a conversation, it better helps fulfill the purpose of the church.
What do you think of logos? Do they “impose an identity” on the product/team/candidate? Do you have a favorite?
The world looks to DC
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Cyclists and Civilization
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Why I am a fan of my church
At Justin’s invitation, I have become a “fan” of my church. This does not mean I have sat in a stadium with 89,000 other church fans and rooted for my church to defeat another church on some sort of ecumenical playing field. I have not screamed as my church’s electric guitar player strummed – slowly, as if savoring good-tasting and sexual at the same time – those all-too familiar chords of the song the most people agree are the strongest. My church has not authored one of my top-ten favorite books, nor has it starred, directed, produced or cinematographized (I know, I’m really reaching) a film that I have been trying to tell my friends about (though, I hasten to point out, a church member has). My church has not rallied me to believe that by electing it to a higher office, the American dream would be made more possible, not just to me, but to all of our citizens.
As you can guess, I struggled with this. Being a fan is a superficial activity. A church should not be superficial. It’s about Christ, his body, his sacraments. Being a fan comes across as tribal. Church is about overcoming tribalism and loving everyone, regardless. I am not always good at overcoming my tribalism and my superficiality, and sometimes churches are not either. By God’s grace, we move in this direction. So how can a be a fan?
My new status as church-fan is an electronic proclamation via Facebook, and therein lies my justification for church fandom. Yes, much of Facebook is about identifying yourself in groups, and much of this lies between superficiality, randomness and nerdiness. I reached the height of nerddom when I joined a group about dinosaurs. But one of the redeeming factors of the younger generation is how we can reveal a subtle realness behind things superficial, random and nerdy. I think we’ve learned to do this growing up under a barrage of electronic advertising. Between all the silliness, we can shout something real across the bluish landscapes of Facebooks. I belong to a community of people who are seeking Christ. We are led by people who have studied the scriptures, and from there, they give us direction, admonition and encouragement. We meet in the evenings, sing, confess, read, listen, pray, proclaim, eat bread and drink wine. We study, reach out, and seek to live like we believe the Spirit of God is within us (as our recent study in 1Corinthians has emphasized). We are not perfect, and we are aware of it. Everybody is invited.
And our new website is going to be pretty cool.